Anarcho-Capitalism vs. Right Libertarianism

Attribute	Anarcho-Capitalism	Right Libertarianism
Government Involvement	Opposes all forms of government involvement	Advocates for limited government involvement
Property Rights	Emphasizes strong property rights	Supports property rights but may allow for some limitations
Free Market	Believes in completely free markets	Supports free markets with some regulations
Individualism	Emphasizes individual rights and autonomy	Values individual rights and autonomy
Voluntary Interactions	Advocates for all interactions to be voluntary	Values voluntary interactions but may allow for some exceptions

Definition

Anarcho-Capitalism is a political philosophy that advocates for the elimination of the state in favor of a completely free market system. It believes that all services traditionally provided by the government, such as law enforcement and national defense, can be better handled by private companies in a competitive market. Right Libertarianism, on the other hand, is a political philosophy that emphasizes individual liberty and limited government intervention in economic and social matters. It believes in free markets, property rights, and voluntary exchange.

Role of Government

One key difference between Anarcho-Capitalism and Right Libertarianism is their views on the role of government. Anarcho-Capitalists believe that the state should be abolished entirely, with all functions of government being taken over by private companies. Right Libertarians, on the other hand, believe in a minimal state that only exists to protect individual rights and enforce contracts. They see government as a necessary evil that should be limited in scope and power.

Economic System

Both Anarcho-Capitalism and Right Libertarianism advocate for free market capitalism. However, Anarcho-Capitalists take this belief to the extreme by arguing for the complete privatization of all industries and services, including law enforcement and national defense. Right Libertarians, on the other hand, believe in a more moderate approach, with some government regulation to prevent monopolies and ensure fair competition.

Property Rights

Property rights are a central tenet of both Anarcho-Capitalism and Right Libertarianism. Both philosophies believe that individuals have the right to own and control their property without interference from the government. However, Anarcho-Capitalists take this belief further by arguing that all property, including land and natural resources, should be privately owned. Right Libertarians, on the other hand, believe in a more nuanced approach to property rights, with some recognition of common property and public goods.

Social Issues

When it comes to social issues, Anarcho-Capitalism and Right Libertarianism differ in their approach. Anarcho-Capitalists tend to focus solely on economic freedom and individual rights, with little concern for social justice or equality. Right Libertarians, on the other hand, may be more open to government intervention in areas such as civil rights and environmental protection, as long as it does not infringe on individual liberties.

Foreign Policy

Another area of difference between Anarcho-Capitalism and Right Libertarianism is their views on foreign policy. Anarcho-Capitalists tend to be isolationist, believing that countries should not interfere in the affairs of other nations. Right Libertarians, on the other hand, may support a more interventionist foreign policy, especially when it comes to protecting national security and promoting free trade.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while Anarcho-Capitalism and Right Libertarianism share some similarities in their advocacy for free markets and individual rights, they differ in their views on the role of government, property rights, social issues, and foreign policy. Anarcho-Capitalism takes a more radical approach by calling for the complete abolition of the state, while Right Libertarianism advocates for a limited government that protects individual rights and enforces contracts. Ultimately, the choice between these two philosophies comes down to how much government intervention one believes is necessary to maintain a free and just society.