vs.

AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB vs. Radeon Vega 5 Graphics

What's the Difference?

The AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB is an older graphics card that was released in 2014, while the Radeon Vega 5 Graphics is a more recent integrated graphics solution that is commonly found in laptops and budget desktops. The Radeon R9 280 offers better performance and more VRAM compared to the Vega 5 Graphics, making it a better option for gaming and other graphics-intensive tasks. However, the Vega 5 Graphics is more power-efficient and cost-effective, making it a suitable choice for casual users or those on a budget. Overall, the Radeon R9 280 is a more powerful option for gaming and professional work, while the Vega 5 Graphics is a more budget-friendly and energy-efficient choice for everyday tasks.

Comparison

AttributeAMD Radeon R9 280 3GBRadeon Vega 5 Graphics
ManufacturerAMDAMD
Release Year20142017
Memory3GB GDDR5Integrated
ArchitectureGCN 1.1Vega
PerformanceMid-rangeEntry-level

Further Detail

Performance

When it comes to performance, the AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB is a mid-range graphics card that was released in 2014. It features 3GB of GDDR5 memory and 1792 stream processors, which allows it to handle most modern games at 1080p resolution with decent frame rates. On the other hand, the Radeon Vega 5 Graphics is an integrated GPU that is commonly found in budget laptops. It offers significantly lower performance compared to the R9 280, making it suitable for light gaming and everyday tasks rather than demanding AAA titles.

Architecture

The Radeon R9 280 is based on the Graphics Core Next (GCN) 1.0 architecture, which was a significant improvement over its predecessor in terms of performance and power efficiency. It also supports DirectX 12 and OpenGL 4.4, allowing it to run the latest games and applications. In contrast, the Radeon Vega 5 Graphics is built on the newer Vega architecture, which offers better performance per watt and improved efficiency. It also supports newer technologies such as Vulkan and FreeSync, providing a more modern gaming experience.

Memory

As mentioned earlier, the Radeon R9 280 comes with 3GB of GDDR5 memory, which is sufficient for most gaming scenarios at 1080p resolution. The memory bandwidth of the R9 280 is 224 GB/s, allowing it to handle high-resolution textures and effects with ease. On the other hand, the Radeon Vega 5 Graphics uses system memory for its graphics processing, which can lead to lower performance compared to dedicated VRAM. This can be a limiting factor when playing games or running graphics-intensive applications.

Connectivity

Both the Radeon R9 280 and Radeon Vega 5 Graphics offer a variety of connectivity options. The R9 280 comes with two DVI ports, one HDMI port, and one DisplayPort, allowing users to connect multiple monitors or TVs. It also supports AMD CrossFire technology for multi-GPU setups. The Radeon Vega 5 Graphics, being an integrated GPU, typically comes with fewer connectivity options, such as one HDMI port and one DisplayPort. This can be a limitation for users who require multiple display outputs.

Power Consumption

One of the key differences between the Radeon R9 280 and Radeon Vega 5 Graphics is their power consumption. The R9 280 is a dedicated graphics card that requires a separate power connector from the power supply unit. It has a TDP of around 200W, which is relatively high compared to modern GPUs. On the other hand, the Radeon Vega 5 Graphics is an integrated GPU that draws power from the laptop's battery or power supply. It has a much lower TDP, typically around 15-25W, making it more energy-efficient and suitable for portable devices.

Price

When it comes to pricing, the Radeon R9 280 can be found on the used market for around $100-$150, depending on the condition and seller. It offers good value for budget gamers who are looking for decent performance at a low cost. On the other hand, laptops with Radeon Vega 5 Graphics are typically priced higher due to the inclusion of other components such as the CPU, RAM, and storage. This can make them less attractive for users on a tight budget.

Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.