Acquisition vs. Takeover

What's the Difference?

Acquisition and takeover are two terms commonly used in the business world to describe the process of one company gaining control over another. However, there are subtle differences between the two. Acquisition refers to the purchase of a majority stake or all the assets of a target company by another company. It can be a friendly transaction, where both parties agree on the terms, or a hostile one, where the target company is unwilling to be acquired. On the other hand, a takeover typically refers to a hostile acquisition, where the acquiring company forcefully takes control of the target company against its will. Takeovers often involve a hostile bid or a proxy fight to gain control of the target company's board of directors. While both acquisition and takeover involve one company gaining control over another, the key distinction lies in the level of consent and cooperation between the parties involved.


DefinitionAcquiring one company by another, usually through a purchase of a majority stake or all of its assets.Forcible acquisition of one company by another, often against the will of the target company's management.
Voluntary/InvoluntaryCan be voluntary or involuntary, depending on the agreement between the acquiring and target companies.Involuntary, as it involves the target company being taken over without its consent.
ControlThe acquiring company gains control over the target company's operations, assets, and decision-making.The acquiring company gains complete control over the target company, often replacing its management.
ObjectiveAcquiring company aims to expand its market presence, diversify its offerings, or gain synergies.Acquiring company aims to gain control, eliminate competition, or access specific assets or markets.
ConsentRequires the consent or agreement of both the acquiring and target companies.Does not require the consent or agreement of the target company.
HostilityCan be friendly or hostile, depending on the negotiation and agreement between the companies.Often hostile, as the target company's management may resist the takeover attempt.
Legal ProcessCan involve legal processes, such as due diligence, negotiations, and regulatory approvals.May involve legal processes, such as shareholder voting, regulatory approvals, and legal challenges.
OwnershipThe acquiring company becomes the owner of the target company's assets and operations.The acquiring company becomes the sole owner of the target company, often merging or dissolving it.

Further Detail


In the world of business, growth and expansion are key objectives for companies. Two common strategies employed to achieve these goals are acquisition and takeover. While these terms are often used interchangeably, they have distinct attributes and implications. In this article, we will delve into the differences between acquisition and takeover, exploring their definitions, processes, motivations, and impacts.

Defining Acquisition

An acquisition refers to the process of one company purchasing another company, either through a stock or asset transaction. In an acquisition, the acquiring company assumes control over the target company, integrating it into its existing operations. This can be a friendly or hostile transaction, depending on the consent of the target company's management and board of directors.

Defining Takeover

A takeover, on the other hand, is a specific type of acquisition where the acquiring company gains control over the target company against the wishes of its management and board of directors. Takeovers are typically hostile and involve the acquiring company bypassing negotiations and directly approaching the target company's shareholders to gain a controlling stake.

The Process of Acquisition

The process of acquisition involves several stages. Firstly, the acquiring company identifies a potential target company that aligns with its strategic objectives. Negotiations then take place between the two parties to determine the terms of the acquisition, including the purchase price and any conditions. Once an agreement is reached, the acquiring company conducts due diligence to assess the target company's financial health, operations, and potential risks. Finally, the acquisition is completed through the transfer of ownership, either through a stock purchase or asset transfer.

The Process of Takeover

Takeovers, being hostile in nature, follow a different process. The acquiring company identifies a target company it believes has potential value or synergies. Instead of negotiating with the target company's management, the acquiring company directly approaches the target company's shareholders, often making a public offer to purchase their shares at a premium. If a sufficient number of shareholders accept the offer, the acquiring company gains a controlling stake and can then enforce its control over the target company.

Motivations for Acquisition

Companies pursue acquisitions for various reasons. One common motivation is to expand their market presence and increase their customer base. By acquiring a company operating in a different geographic region or targeting a different customer segment, the acquiring company can tap into new markets and diversify its revenue streams. Additionally, acquisitions can provide access to new technologies, intellectual property, or distribution channels, enabling the acquiring company to enhance its competitive advantage.

Another motivation for acquisition is to achieve economies of scale. By combining operations, companies can reduce costs through synergies, such as shared resources, streamlined processes, and consolidated purchasing power. This can lead to increased profitability and improved efficiency. Furthermore, acquisitions can be driven by the desire to eliminate competition. By acquiring a rival company, the acquiring company can eliminate a competitor from the market, gaining a larger market share and potentially increasing pricing power.

Motivations for Takeover

Takeovers, on the other hand, are often motivated by a desire for rapid expansion or market dominance. The acquiring company may believe that the target company possesses valuable assets, technologies, or market share that can be quickly integrated into its own operations. Takeovers can also be driven by the potential for cost savings through the elimination of duplicate functions or the consolidation of operations.

Furthermore, takeovers can be seen as a defensive strategy. If a company perceives a rival as a threat, it may attempt a hostile takeover to prevent the rival from gaining a competitive advantage. By gaining control over the target company, the acquiring company can neutralize the threat and protect its market position.

Impacts of Acquisition

Acquisitions can have significant impacts on both the acquiring company and the target company. For the acquiring company, an acquisition can lead to increased market share, expanded product offerings, and enhanced competitiveness. However, it also carries risks, such as integration challenges, cultural clashes, and potential financial burdens if the acquisition does not meet expectations.

For the target company, an acquisition can provide access to additional resources, expertise, and growth opportunities. However, it may also result in job losses, changes in company culture, and a loss of independence. The impact on shareholders can vary, with some benefiting from the premium paid for their shares, while others may experience a decline in the value of their investment if the acquisition does not generate the expected synergies.

Impacts of Takeover

Takeovers can have profound effects on all parties involved. For the acquiring company, a successful takeover can lead to increased market power, expanded operations, and potential cost savings. However, hostile takeovers can be costly and time-consuming, with potential legal battles and resistance from the target company's management and shareholders.

The target company, in a takeover scenario, often experiences a loss of control and independence. The existing management may be replaced, and the company's strategic direction may change. Shareholders of the target company may benefit from the premium offered for their shares, but they may also face uncertainty and potential losses if the acquiring company fails to deliver on its promises.


In summary, while acquisition and takeover are both strategies used to achieve growth and expansion, they differ in their nature, processes, motivations, and impacts. Acquisitions involve the purchase of a company, either through friendly negotiations or hostile takeovers, with the aim of expanding market presence, achieving synergies, or eliminating competition. Takeovers, on the other hand, are hostile acquisitions where the acquiring company bypasses negotiations and directly approaches the target company's shareholders. Takeovers are often driven by a desire for rapid expansion, market dominance, or defensive strategies.

Regardless of the approach, both acquisition and takeover have significant implications for the acquiring company, the target company, and their respective stakeholders. It is crucial for companies to carefully consider their motivations, conduct thorough due diligence, and plan for effective integration to maximize the potential benefits and mitigate the risks associated with these strategic moves.

Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.