2013 BMW F10 M5 vs. 2015 BMW F82 M4
What's the Difference?
The 2013 BMW F10 M5 and the 2015 BMW F82 M4 are both high-performance vehicles from BMW, but they have some key differences. The F10 M5 is a sedan with a powerful V8 engine, while the F82 M4 is a coupe with a turbocharged inline-six engine. The M5 offers more interior space and comfort, making it a better choice for daily driving, while the M4 is more focused on performance and agility, making it a better choice for track days. Both cars offer impressive performance and handling, but the M4 is lighter and more nimble, while the M5 has more power and luxury features. Ultimately, the choice between the two will come down to personal preference and intended use.
Comparison
Attribute | 2013 BMW F10 M5 | 2015 BMW F82 M4 |
---|---|---|
Engine | 4.4L V8 | 3.0L Inline-6 |
Horsepower | 560 hp | 425 hp |
Torque | 500 lb-ft | 406 lb-ft |
0-60 mph | 4.1 seconds | 4.1 seconds |
Top Speed | 155 mph (limited) | 155 mph (limited) |
Transmission | 7-speed dual-clutch | 6-speed manual or 7-speed dual-clutch |
Further Detail
Exterior Design
The 2013 BMW F10 M5 features a more traditional sedan design with four doors, while the 2015 BMW F82 M4 is a sleeker coupe with only two doors. The M5 has a longer wheelbase and overall length compared to the M4, giving it a more imposing presence on the road. Both models come with signature BMW styling cues such as the kidney grille and quad exhaust pipes, but the M4 has a more aggressive stance with wider fenders and a lower roofline.
Performance
When it comes to performance, both the 2013 M5 and 2015 M4 are powered by high-performance engines from BMW's M division. The M5 is equipped with a 4.4-liter twin-turbo V8 engine that produces 560 horsepower and 500 lb-ft of torque, allowing it to accelerate from 0-60 mph in just 4.2 seconds. On the other hand, the M4 is powered by a 3.0-liter twin-turbo inline-six engine that delivers 425 horsepower and 406 lb-ft of torque, enabling it to reach 0-60 mph in 4.1 seconds.
Interior Features
Inside the cabin, both the 2013 M5 and 2015 M4 offer a luxurious and sporty environment with high-quality materials and advanced technology. The M5 comes with more space and comfort for rear passengers due to its sedan body style, while the M4 provides a more intimate and driver-focused cockpit with a lower seating position. Both models feature BMW's iDrive infotainment system, leather upholstery, and carbon fiber trim, but the M5 offers more standard features such as a heads-up display and ventilated seats.
Handling and Driving Dynamics
Despite their differences in body style, the 2013 M5 and 2015 M4 both deliver exceptional handling and driving dynamics that are characteristic of BMW's M division. The M5 offers a more comfortable and composed ride thanks to its longer wheelbase and adaptive suspension system, making it a great choice for long-distance cruising. On the other hand, the M4 is more agile and responsive in corners due to its shorter wheelbase and lower weight, making it a more engaging and thrilling driving experience on twisty roads.
Technology and Safety Features
Both the 2013 M5 and 2015 M4 come equipped with a wide range of technology and safety features to enhance the driving experience and provide peace of mind on the road. The M5 offers advanced driver assistance systems such as adaptive cruise control and lane departure warning, as well as a surround-view camera system for easier parking. The M4, on the other hand, focuses more on performance-oriented features such as a launch control system and M Drive mode for customizable driving settings.
Price and Value
When it comes to pricing, the 2013 M5 is typically more expensive than the 2015 M4 due to its larger size and higher level of luxury features. However, both models offer excellent value for money considering their performance capabilities and premium build quality. The M5 may appeal to buyers looking for a more practical and spacious daily driver, while the M4 is a better choice for enthusiasts seeking a more focused and dynamic driving experience.
Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.