vs.

1992 Buffalo Bills vs. 1993 Buffalo Bills

What's the Difference?

The 1992 Buffalo Bills were a dominant force in the NFL, finishing the regular season with an 11-5 record and making it to their third consecutive Super Bowl. Led by quarterback Jim Kelly and running back Thurman Thomas, the Bills had a high-powered offense that was able to outscore their opponents. However, in the Super Bowl, they were defeated by the Washington Redskins. In contrast, the 1993 Buffalo Bills had a slightly less successful season, finishing with a 12-4 record and making it to the divisional round of the playoffs before being eliminated by the Kansas City Chiefs. Despite their strong regular season performance, the Bills were unable to make it back to the Super Bowl for a fourth consecutive year.

Comparison

Attribute1992 Buffalo Bills1993 Buffalo Bills
Head CoachMarv LevyMarv Levy
Record11-512-4
Playoff ResultLost Super Bowl XXVIILost Super Bowl XXVIII
Key PlayersJim Kelly, Thurman Thomas, Bruce SmithJim Kelly, Thurman Thomas, Bruce Smith
Offensive Rank1st2nd
Defensive Rank8th6th

Further Detail

Offensive Performance

The 1992 Buffalo Bills were known for their high-powered offense led by quarterback Jim Kelly and running back Thurman Thomas. They averaged 26.8 points per game and had a balanced attack that could beat teams through the air or on the ground. Wide receiver Andre Reed was a key target for Kelly, while Thomas was a threat both as a runner and receiver out of the backfield.

In contrast, the 1993 Buffalo Bills saw a slight dip in offensive production, averaging 23.6 points per game. Kelly and Thomas were still effective, but injuries to key players like Reed and Thomas limited the team's ability to score consistently. The offense relied more on Kelly's arm in 1993, as the running game was not as dominant as it had been in previous years.

Defensive Performance

The 1992 Buffalo Bills had a solid defense that ranked 8th in the league in points allowed per game. Led by defensive end Bruce Smith and linebacker Cornelius Bennett, the Bills were able to pressure opposing quarterbacks and create turnovers. The secondary, anchored by cornerback Nate Odomes, was also a strength of the defense.

On the other hand, the 1993 Buffalo Bills struggled on defense, allowing 22.2 points per game, which ranked 17th in the league. Smith and Bennett were still effective, but the defense as a whole was not as dominant as it had been in previous years. The secondary had trouble containing opposing passing attacks, leading to more big plays and points allowed.

Special Teams

The 1992 Buffalo Bills had a reliable special teams unit that was able to flip field position and make key plays in the kicking game. Kicker Steve Christie was consistent in converting field goals, while returner Al Edwards provided a spark in the return game. Punter Chris Mohr was also a weapon in pinning opponents deep in their own territory.

In comparison, the 1993 Buffalo Bills had some struggles on special teams, with missed field goals and inconsistent returns hurting the team's field position. Christie had a down year in terms of accuracy, and the return game was not as explosive as it had been in previous years. Mohr was still effective in punting, but the overall special teams unit was not as strong as it had been in 1992.

Overall Team Chemistry

The 1992 Buffalo Bills were known for their chemistry and camaraderie, with players rallying around each other and playing as a cohesive unit. The team had a winning mentality and a never-say-die attitude that helped them overcome adversity and win close games. Head coach Marv Levy was able to keep the team focused and motivated throughout the season.

Conversely, the 1993 Buffalo Bills seemed to lack the same level of chemistry and cohesion that had been present in the previous year. Injuries and inconsistent play led to frustration among players, and the team struggled to find its identity on both sides of the ball. Levy tried to keep the team together, but the lack of chemistry ultimately hurt the Bills' performance on the field.

Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.